On the DLA (David Liberman algorithm) tools for analyzing non verbal manifestations and its psychoanalytic foundations
D. Maldavsky, O. Bodni, I. Cusien, C. Falise, E. Garzoli, C. R: Roitman, R. Sloin de Berenstein, C. Tate de Stanley, E. Tarrab
I. Foundations of the tools
Freudian theory for understanding clinical manifestation takes into account two concepts: 1) libidinal fixations and 2) defenses.
| Erotogenicities | Defenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Using David Liberman algoritm (DLA), erotogenities and defenses can be investigated in the scenes displayed or narrated by the patient (and eventually also the therapist). Some DLA tools allow to detect libidinal fixations and defenses in narration and speech acts levels of the discourse. While narration level allows to detect extratransferential conflicts, speech acts level permits to research the transferential ones. The basic scenes (narrated or displayed as speech acts) are:
Grid of scenes
EROTICISM
SCENE |
GENITAL PHALLIC |
PHALLIC URETHRAL |
SECONDARY ANAL SADISTIC |
PRIMARY ANAL SADISTIC |
SECONDARY ORAL SADISTIC |
PRIMARY ORAL |
INTRA-SOMATIC LIBIDO |
Initial state |
Aesthetic harmony |
Routine |
Hierarchical order |
Natural legal equilibrium |
Paradise |
Cognitive peace |
Equilibrium between |
First transformation |
Desire for aesthetic completion |
Ambitious desire |
Desire to dominate an object in the framework of a public oath |
Desire driven by thirst for justice |
Temptation Expiation |
Abstract cognitive desire |
Speculative desire |
Second transformation= Attempt to consummate desire |
Reception of a Power-Gift |
Finding the mark of the father deep in the object |
Discerning that the object is faithful to corrupt subjects |
Revenge |
Sin Reparation |
Access to a truth |
Gain in pleasure through organic intrusion |
Third transformation= Consequences of the attempt to consummate desire |
Pregnancy
Aesthetic disorganization |
Challenge of adventure Challenge of routine
|
Virtue recognized
Social condemnation and moral expulsion
|
Leadership formally recognized, honoured |
Forgiveness and loving recognition
Expulsion from Paradise
|
Recognition of genius Loss of lucidity; the other enjoys objective cognition |
Organic euphoria
Asthenia |
Final state |
Shared harmony Lasting feeling of disgust |
Adventure Pessimistic routine |
Moral peace Moral torment |
Evocation of heroic past or Return to lasting peace |
Vale of tears
Recovery of Paradise |
Bliss in revelation Loss of the essence |
Balance of tensions with no energy loss Lasting tension or asthenia |
II. Tools for analyzing erotogenicities
The previous foundation is useful for investigating different kinds of non verbal manifestations: sounds of verbalizations, visual images, movements, intersubjective distances.
II. 1. Tool for analyzing paraverbal manifestations
The acoustic components of the words interchanged during the session can be studied considering 1) tone, 2) timbre, 3) rhythm, 4) sounds. The corresponding grid allows to detect the scene displayed in this level of analysis. Like phrases, the grid of paraverbal components allows us to infer transferential conflicts.
Erotogenicities and sounds
LI |
O1 |
O2 |
A1 |
A2 |
UPH |
GPH |
Tone: |
Tone: |
Tone: |
Tone: |
Tone: |
Tone: |
Tone: |
2) monotonous |
2) languishing |
2) depressive |
2) upset and bored |
2) ironic |
2) distrustful |
2) compliment |
3) pleading |
3) lack of affectivity |
3) excited or manic |
3) protest |
3) rational |
3) with excuses |
3) promising |
4) flattering |
4) intellectual humor |
4) desperate |
4) suspicious |
4) admonitory |
4) whispering |
4) inviting |
5) sleepy |
Rhythm, timbre and sounds: |
5) impatient |
5) accusing |
5) controlled |
5) pessimistic |
5) seductive |
6) languishing |
2) little difference in pitch |
6) sarcastic |
6) mockery |
6) imperative |
6) with proverbs |
6) disgusting |
7) bathroom humor |
3) clucking sound of the tongue |
7) reproaching |
7) provocative |
7) judgmental |
7) pleasing |
7) declamatory |
8) lack of affectivity |
4) “contained laughter” (with lips closed) |
8) begging |
8) insulting |
8) critical |
8) premonitory |
8) infantile |
9) infantile |
|
9) compassio-nate |
9) arrogant |
9) clarifying |
9) corrosive and poignant humor |
9) laughably |
rhythm, timbre and sounds: |
|
10) litany |
10) insinuating |
10) explaining |
rhythm, timbre and sounds |
rhythm, timbre and sounds |
2) scream |
|
11) pleasing |
11) imperative |
11) indicative |
2) hissing sounds |
2) exclamation of joy |
3) acceleration |
|
12) guilty |
12) resentful |
12) sententious |
3) whistling |
3) exclamation of anger |
4) agitation |
|
13) laughing |
13) spiteful |
13) solemn |
4) sudden drop in sound intensity |
4) exclamation of disgust |
5) cough |
|
14) choleric |
14) choleric |
14) doubtful |
|
5) exclamation of surprise |
6) sneeze |
|
15) sardonic humor |
15) threatening |
15) gallows humor |
|
6) exclamation of admiration |
7) sniff |
|
16) gallows humor |
16) defiant |
rhythm, timbre and sounds |
|
7) onomatopoeia |
8) hiccup |
|
17) festive humor |
17) provocative and hurtful humor |
|
|
8) cough |
9) bowel sounds |
|
rhythm, timbre and sounds |
rhythm, timbre and sounds |
|
|
9) clearing the throat |
10) clearing the throat |
|
2) sobbing |
|
|
|
|
11) burp |
|
3) painful (due to psychic pain) |
|
|
|
|
12) yawn |
|
4) lament |
|
|
|
|
13) crying |
|
5) laughing |
|
|
|
|
14) sobbing |
|
6) acclamation |
|
|
|
|
15) pant |
|
7) slowness |
|
|
|
|
16) slowness |
|
8) shortening |
|
|
|
|
17) puffing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18) complaint (about physical pain) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19) litany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20) onomatopoeia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21) snuffling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22) silly laugh |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23) quiet, muted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24) grind |
|
|
|
|
|
|
II. 2. Tool for analyzing motrix activity
Each movement of the patient can be understood including it into a motrix program. To each erotogenicity corresponds a specific motrix program.
Erotogenicities and motrix program
Erotogenicity |
IL |
O1 |
O2 |
A1 |
A2 |
UPH |
GPH |
Motricity |
Tending to inner alteration (i.e., self-soothing procedures) |
Tendency to the extraction of an essence (or liquid), or of an abstract clue (fingers, tongue, eyes) |
Tending to express affects |
Tending to vengeance on the other |
Tending to grasp and dominate the object |
Tending to penetrate |
Waving, tending to aesthetic totality |
The motrix activity contains some movements expressing states and other ones (active or passive) corresponding to actions. These ones can be prepatatories, consumatives or complementaries. Other movements correspond to the efforts for dominate and coordinate the own specific motrix apparatus (ocular coordination, walking, writting, etc.)
II. 3. Tool for analyzing visual manifestations
Visual images can be studied considering iconic or plastic level. The tool for analyzing the narrated scenes previously exposed can be useful for studying iconic level. For studying plastic level, DLA contains a description of the specific formalization of the perceptive world, each one expressing an erotogenicity:
Erotogenicity |
IL |
O1 |
O2 |
A1 |
A2 |
UPH |
GPH |
Formalization of perceptive world |
Frequency |
Punctiform |
Perception of affective states |
Discrete traits |
Hierarchic order for observing totality and classifying details |
Fascination with an enigmatic (incomplete) aspect in the nucleus of the object |
Totalizing fascination |
II. 4. Tool for analyzing the subjective distance
The analysis of movements and visual manifestation can be combined with the study of the distance, either between the characters in a design or between the subject in movement and the others. DLA contains a tool useful for this kind of analysis.
Erotogenicity |
IL |
O1 |
O2 |
A1 |
A2 |
UPH |
GPH |
Distance |
Intracorporal |
Public |
Intimate |
Intimate (in the moment of the vengeance) |
Social |
Personal |
Simultaneously |
III. Tools for analyzing defenses
The tools for the analysis of non verbal manifestations also allow to detect the defenses and their state. For this, a sequence of steps of analysis is available.
Steps for analyzing defenses
Problem |
Procedure |
1. To decide which defense prevails |
Detecting which is the dominant language |
2. To decide whether the defense is repression, disavowal, foreclosure or creativity / sublimation |
Detecting whether the language contained in the scene narrated harmonizes with the context |
3. To decide whether the defense (repression, disavowal or foreclosure) is functional or pathological |
Detecting whether one language dominates the others, or uses them and becomes hypertrophied |
4. To decide whether the pathological defense is failed, successful or both |
Detecting the position of the narrator and the prevalence of actions or states |
IV. Comments
The application of each tool gives multivariate results on erotogenicities and defenses. This fact demands a decision of the researcher concerning the relative relevance of each erotogenicity and defense. Besides, it’s possible to combine the application of various of these tools. Also the researcher can combine one of more of the tools for analyzing non verbal manifestations with other ones studying the discourse of one or more interlocutors.